A Boeing 767-300 is ready on a Department of Defense runway at Boscombe Down in Amesbury to transport the first migrants to the East African country tonight. A Kurd rejected an attempt to prevent Rwanda from being removed from the Supreme Court this afternoon by Justice Smith, who also denied him an appeal. The challenges of three other asylum seekers were rejected earlier in the day. Johnson hints UK may withdraw from European Convention on Human Rights – Political news live A fifth man lost an attempt to appeal to the Supreme Court after a panel of three judges refused to challenge the Court of Appeal’s decision that the flight to Rwanda could take place. This rejected an appeal by two refugee charities and the Public and Commercial Services Association. Citing brief reasons for the ruling, the court’s president, Lord Reed, said there had been an “assurance” that if the government’s policy of expelling asylum seekers in Rwanda was deemed illegal, measures would be taken to repatriate the relocated migrants. in the intermediate nation of East Africa. Protesters in Stop Deportations took immediate action to resist the first deportation flight, locking themselves in metal pipes and closing the exits of the Colnbrook Immigration Center in Heathrow, where the Home Office is believed to have targeted flight to Rwanda. held. “This policy is the result of many years of portraying immigrants as less than human beings; it enables the Ministry of Interior to cause them pain and escape. We, the public, refuse to accept the cruel, inhuman and inhuman behavior of the Ministry. “Illegal plans,” said a Stop Deportations activist. However, Foreign Minister Liz Tras insisted that the flight to Rwanda would take off no matter how few people were on the plane, and said the program was both legal and “value for money”. The plan to send people to Rwanda was challenged in the courts and condemned by the senior bishops of the Church of England as “an immoral policy”. However, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the aim of the policy was “to support safe and legal routes for people to come to the UK and oppose illegal and dangerous routes”. The prime minister has vowed to “continue” with Rwandan politics Mr Johnson added that the program “may take some time to work properly, but that does not mean we are not going to continue”. Asked if it would be necessary to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights in order to limit legal challenges, Mr Johnson added: “Will it be necessary to change some laws to help us as we move forward? is under constant review “. Sky News understands that seven asylum seekers are going to make the first flight from the United Kingdom to the East African country, which will take off this afternoon. However, at least one of the men is expected to file an urgent appeal to the Court of Appeals, which is likely to be discussed out of hours by a single judge by telephone. The four possible deportees who missed the Supreme Court bids today to avoid being flown on the plane include: An Iraqi Kurd who had suffered from PTSD in Turkey while traveling in the United Kingdom and had filed a claim asking not to leave because of his mental health and his relationship with his sister, who lives in the United Kingdom. • A Vietnamese man who claimed to have received death threats from moneylenders in Vietnam, who also refused after a judge rejected the argument that he was denied translation services. • A man who traveled to the United Kingdom from Iran with his 21-year-old son and asked the court to prevent his removal due to his mental health and right to family life. • a request from a Kurd, to whom he also refused to appeal. Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:01 Lawyers “undermine” Rwanda’s policy Tras rejects Rwandan plan ‘shames Britain’ The lawyers discussed in court how the plaintiffs could appeal the decisions if deported. Any appeals would be heard first in the Court of Appeals and then an application could be submitted to the Supreme Court. Ms Troy told Sky News she could not say exactly how many migrants would be on the plane that was due to take off this afternoon. However, he dismissed claims by Church of England leaders that the policy of pushing asylum seekers on a one-way flight to East Africa “shames Britain”. An appeal to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal by teams including Care4Calais on the first flight under the Rwandan program has failed to raise the cost of the flight to .000 500,000. The government has rejected this amount, but the cost of deportation is believed to be hundreds of thousands of pounds. The aim of the program is to prevent people from crossing into the UK illegally. So far, 92 adults and 12 children have been transported ashore by Border Forces officials today following an attempt to cross the Channel. They said they came from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Image: The Hope Hostel accommodation in Kigali, Rwanda The policy is inapplicable, Labor says Mr Johnson responded to lawyers who challenged the policy in the Cabinet this morning. “What criminal gangs are doing and what those who are actually inciting the work of criminal gangs are doing is undermining citizens’ trust in a secure and legal system,” he said. Read more: What is it like to be a refugee in Rwanda? Why are migrants being sent to Rwanda and how will it work? In Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, Sky News asked the government how they felt about the deportees, who said they would rather die than be sent there. “We do not consider life in Rwanda a punishment,” said Yolande Makolo. Labor’s shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell told Sky News: “We think this policy is inapplicable … it is incredibly expensive. It will probably cost over a million pounds per failed or successful refugee going to Rwanda. And we believe that it’s immoral – and in fact it is completely anti-British. “ Meanwhile, the archbishops of Canterbury and York – as well as 23 other bishops – wrote a letter to the Times claiming that no attempt had been made to “understand the plight” of those affected. Their letter states: “Whether the first expulsion flight leaves Britain today for Rwanda, this policy should embarrass us as a nation. “The shame is ours, because our Christian heritage should inspire us to treat asylum seekers with compassion, justice and fairness, as we have done for centuries.” Last year, more than 28,000 people crossed the Channel in small boats – more than three times the number seen in 2020. More than half were either Iranians or Iraqis, with people from Eritrea and Syria crossing, according to the Interior Ministry.
