The Boeing 767-300 is located at Boscombe Down in Amesbury. It comes as a three-judge panel refused to challenge the man’s appeal on Monday, which upheld a previous Supreme Court judge’s decision not to order his removal from the flight. Citing brief reasons for the ruling, the court’s president, Lord Reed, said there had been an “assurance” that if the government’s policy of expelling asylum seekers in Rwanda was deemed illegal, measures would be taken to repatriate the relocated migrants. in the intermediate nation of East Africa. Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the program “may take some time to work properly, but that does not mean we are not going to continue.” He added: “Will we need to change some laws to help us as we move forward? It may well be that all of these options are under constant scrutiny.” Sky News understands that seven asylum seekers are going to make the first flight from the United Kingdom to the East African country, which will take off this afternoon. Another asylum seeker today lost his attempt to the Supreme Court to avoid being sent to Rwanda in flight. The man, an Iraqi Kurd, had contracted PTSD in Turkey while traveling in the United Kingdom and had requested not to leave because of his mental health and his relationship with his sister, who lives in the United Kingdom. His request was rejected by Justice Swift, who said: “The Secretary of State had the right to make the decisions he made.” It was the first of four appeals against expulsion orders in Rwanda to be heard in the Supreme Court today. Lawyers are discussing in court how plaintiffs will be able to appeal decisions if they have been deported. Trash challenges critics of Rwandan deportations to find alternative – Political news live Foreign Minister Liz Tras told Sky News this morning that she could not say exactly how many migrants would board the plane, which is scheduled to take off this afternoon. However, he dismissed claims by Church of England leaders that the policy of pushing asylum seekers on a one-way flight to East Africa “shames Britain”. Image: The Hope Hostel accommodation in Kigali, Rwanda Two legal challenges for the first flight under the Rwanda program have now failed with reports raising the cost of the flight to 500 500,000. So far, 92 adults and 12 children have been transported ashore by Border Forces officials this morning after trying to cross the English Channel. Asked where they came from, they said Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Ms True said she could not provide figures for the cost of the flight, but insisted: “It’s value for money.” He dismissed the bishops’ criticism, saying Rwanda’s policy was “completely legal” and “completely moral” and challenged opponents to find an alternative to the plan, which it claimed was “effective and working”. Boris Johnson, meanwhile, has cracked down on lawyers who question the policy – which the government says will prevent migrants from paying smugglers to take them across the dangerous English Channel and not on other routes. He told the Council of Ministers on Tuesday: “What criminal gangs are doing and what those who are effectively inciting the work of criminal gangs are doing is undermining citizens’ confidence in a secure and legal system.” “Impossible and expensive” Labor’s shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell told Sky News: “We think this policy is inapplicable … it is incredibly expensive. It will probably cost over ένα 1 million per failed or successful refugee going to Rwanda. And we believe that is immoral – and in fact not British. “We are known all over the world as a safe haven for those who are really escaping persecution and war – it has been part of our composition in this country for decades.” The Archbishops of Canterbury and York – as well as 23 other bishops – wrote a letter to the Times claiming that no attempt had been made to “understand the plight” of those affected. Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 6:27 “We need legal and safe routes” Following the failure of two legal challenges, a plane is scheduled to depart later for the Rwandan capital, Kigali, but it is unclear how many asylum seekers will be on board. Their letter states: “Whether the first expulsion flight leaves Britain today for Rwanda, this policy should embarrass us as a nation. “The shame is ours, because our Christian heritage should inspire us to treat asylum seekers with compassion, justice and fairness, as we have done for centuries.” More legal challenges today Religious leaders have called for the fight against “evil trafficking” to be provided by providing safe routes for refugees trying to reach the UK, adding: “Deportations and the possible forced return of asylum seekers to their countries of origin are not the way.” . It’s a few days after the Prince of Wales reportedly described Conservative policy as “disgusting” and after Imam Qari Asim, the senior imam at the Makkah Mosque in Leeds, said it was “challenging our human conscience and forcing us to talk about human dignity”. Read more: What is it like to be a refugee in Rwanda? The asylum seeker says he would rather die than be sent to Rwanda. Why are migrants being sent to Rwanda and how will it work? “We welcome the court decision” The government has said it aims to prevent people from making dangerous crossings through the English Channel through weak small boats run by smugglers. Use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player 1:01 Lawyers “undermine” Rwanda’s policy Last year, more than 28,000 people crossed the Channel in small boats – more than three times the number seen in 2020. More than half were either Iranians or Iraqis, with people from Eritrea and Syria crossing, according to the Interior Ministry.
